Evaluation of Grade 7 Mathematics Lesson Exemplars in the Matatag Curriculum of DepEd
Keywords:
DepEd Matatag Curriculum, Grade 7 Mathematics, Matatag Curriculum, Mathematics 7, Matatag Curriculum lesson exemplarAbstract
This study evaluated the key features and instructional design of Grade 7 Mathematics lesson exemplars developed under the Philippine Department of Education’s Matatag Curriculum. Using an embedded mixed methods documentary analysis, the research examined how well these exemplars align with core curriculum construction principles, curriculum determinants, and modern instructional design expectations. Thirty-two official lesson exemplars were systematically analyzed through quantitative content analysis and qualitative thematic coding. Results indicated that the exemplars demonstrate strong alignment with foundational principles such as relevance, continuity, balance, and learner-centeredness, with over 90% alignment in several core areas. The materials clearly specify learning competencies, provide structured learning sequences, and support differentiated and collaborative learning strategies. However, findings also revealed notable gaps. Less than half of the exemplars meaningfully integrate technology-enhanced tasks, and only about one-third embed sustainability, environmental, or global contexts, limiting real-world application and interdisciplinary connections. Thematic analysis confirmed these gaps, showing that while the lessons emphasize competency-based approaches, they often lack specific guidance for integrating digital tools, sustainability issues, or connections to other subject areas. The study concludes that while the lesson exemplars offer a sound foundation for achieving curriculum standards, deliberate improvements are needed to ensure they meet 21st century learning demands. Practical recommendations include embedding clearer ICT activities, contextualizing content with sustainability themes, and fostering interdisciplinary tasks to enrich students’ problem-solving and global awareness. The findings provide valuable insights for curriculum planners, teachers, and policymakers working to strengthen the quality, relevance, and future-readiness of lesson exemplars within the Philippine basic education system.
View or download full article here.
View or download full issue here.
Recommended Citation:
Militante, L. G. P., Aclao, J. T., & Dagondon, L. M. B. (2025). Evaluation of Grade 7 Mathematics Lesson Exemplars in the Matatag Curriculum of DepEd. Ennoia Advances in Social Science, Technology and Education, 01(02). 38-52. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16394502
References
Abbas, S. H. (2020). Curriculum Models. University of Baghdad. https://ircoedu.uobaghdad.edu.iq/wpcontent/uploads/sites/26/uploads/ircoedu/Pages/Electrec%20Lec.%20Pscicologi1/CurriculumModels%20%20%D8%AF.%20%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85.pdf
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5–22. https://herdsa.org.au/system/files/HERDSARHE2014v01p05_0.pdf
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://bayanbox.ir/view/236051966444369258/9781483344379-Designing-and-Conducting-Mixed-Methods-Research-3e.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Department of Education. (2024). Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of the Matatag Curriculum. DepEd Order No. 10, s. 2024. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/DO_s2024_010.pdf
Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://repository.bbg.ac.id/bitstream/606/1/Meeting_Standards_Through_Integrated_Curriculum.pdf
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson. https://www.michaelfullan.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2014/01/3897.Rich_Seam_web.pdf
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://inspirasifoundation.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/05/John-Hattie-Visible-Learning_-A-synthesis-of-over-800-meta-analyses-relating-to-achievement-2008.pdf
Jain, H. (2023, April 7). CIPP Model of Curriculum. Prep With Harshita. https://prepwithharshita.com/cipp-model-of-curriculum/
McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company. https://ide.mit.edu/publication/machine-platformcrowd-harnessing-our-digital-future/
OECD. (2020). Back to the future of education: Four OECD scenarios for schooling. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/178ef527-en
Salami, O. O., & Spangenberg, E. D. (2024). Integration of Geogebra Software Into Mathematics Instruction. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i1.343
Schleicher, A. (2018). World Class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/4789264300002-en
Tikly, L. (2011). Towards a framework for researching the quality of education in low-income countries. Comparative Education, 47(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.541671
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. https://doi.org/10.54675/asrb4722
Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2013). Educational design research. Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/TReeves/publication/285854675_Design_research_from_a_technology_perspective/links/60d2353292851c34e07cc287/Design-research-from-a-technology-perspective.pdf
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2014). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
West Bengal State University. (2020). What is administrative model of curriculum?. https://wbsu.ac.in/web/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/SEM4CSU-2_SCA.pdf
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luz Glenn P. Militante, Joel Aclao, Liezl Marie Dagondon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
